- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Ixfd64 (talk) 23:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Sanjeev Kamboj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable.Self promotion. Shyamsunder (talk) 13:39, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. No claim to notability, no apparent notability. Seems to be a WP:SOAPBOX for the "Tricolor" thing. TJRC (talk) 00:26, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete – main editor is User:Kambojoffice which looks like COI. Oculi (talk) 12:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- See also : Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kambojoffice. TJRC (talk) 23:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. He is not notable by any standard, including WP:BIO and WP:NLAWYER Ira Leviton (talk) 01:38, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - simply fails GNG Spiderone 22:25, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.